Can Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Methods Mitigate Placebo Response Differences Among Patient Populations in Adjunctive Trials of Brivaracetam and Levetiracetam?
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Patients with focal seizures recruited into adjunctive antiepileptic drug (AED) trials have become more refractory and severe over time; concurrently, placebo responses have increased. To attempt to account for heterogeneity among trials, propensity-score weighted patient-level data were used to indirectly compare placebo responses reported in brivaracetam and levetiracetam trials. METHODS Patient-level data from randomised, placebo-controlled brivaracetam (recruited 2007-2014) and levetiracetam (1993-1998) trials were pooled. Consistent inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied and outcomes were defined consistently. Potentially confounding baseline characteristics were adjusted for using propensity score weighting. Weighting success was assessed using placebo response. RESULTS In total, 707 and 473 active drug and 399 and 253 placebo patients comprised the brivaracetam and levetiracetam groups, respectively. Before weighting, several baseline variables were significantly different between groups; after weighting, prior vagal nerve stimulation, co-morbid depression and co-morbid anxiety remained different. Before weighting, median seizure frequency reduction was 21.7 and 3.9% in the brivaracetam and levetiracetam placebo arms, respectively; after weighting, median reduction was 15.0 and 6.0%. The comparison of non-randomised groups could be biased by unobserved confounding factors and region of residence. Lifetime AED history was unavailable in the brivaracetam trials and excluded from analysis. CONCLUSIONS Placebo responses remained different between brivaracetam and levetiracetam trials after propensity score weighting, indicating the presence of residual confounding factors associated with placebo response in these trials. It therefore remains problematic to conduct reliable indirect comparisons of brivaracetam and levetiracetam given the current evidence base, which may apply to comparisons between other AED trials.
منابع مشابه
Levetiracetam vs. brivaracetam for adults with refractory focal seizures: A meta-analysis and indirect comparison
PURPOSE The study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) and brivaracetam (BRV) in adults with refractory focal seizures. METHOD We systematically queried Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. We looked for additional studies in the references of all identified publications and ClinicalTrials.gov. The cutoff day was November 6, 2015. Randomized, double-blin...
متن کاملExtrapolation of a Brivaracetam Exposure-Response Model from Adults to Children with Focal Seizures.
INTRODUCTION Prediction of brivaracetam effects in children was obtained by scaling an existing adult pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for brivaracetam to children, using an existing population PK model for brivaracetam in children. The scaling was supported by estimating the change from adults to children in the concentration-effect relationship parameters for levetiracetam, a com...
متن کاملResponse to Zhang et al.: Levetiracetam vs. brivaracetam for adults with refractory focal seizures: A meta-analysis and indirect comparison
To the Editor, unmeasured confounding further undermines the validity of comparison between these trials. 6. Some of the studies in the meta-analysis included doses that were found to be non-therapeutic in the pivotal studies and have not been approved for clinical use (brivaracetam 5, 20 and 25 mg/day; levetiracetam 500 mg/day). As such, a brivaracetam dose of 5 mg/day should not be compared t...
متن کاملResponse to “Response to Zhang et al.: Levetiracetam vs. brivaracetam for adults with refractory focal seizures: A meta-analysis and indirect comparison”
متن کامل
Efficacy and safety of brivaracetam for partial-onset seizures in 3 pooled clinical studies
OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for SV2A, for treatment of partial-onset (focal) seizures (POS) in adults. METHODS Data were pooled from patients (aged 16-80 years) with POS uncontrolled by 1 to 2 antiepileptic drugs receiving BRV 50, 100, or 200 mg/d or placebo, without titration, in 3 phase III st...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 31 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017